That's a very interesting point. I don't think that Donald Strawn was a
staff member but it is possible that he had alot of money. Yes, I'd like
to see that policy about the 2nd dynamic. Is this a recent policy? When I
was in (over 20 years ago) people were being sent to ethics all the time
for out 2D.
----------Here it is, it's an old policy but not applied because there are
still ethics offenses based on sexual activity. What the ethics officers do
is tell the person that they are handling the "3rd Dynamic" and the
person's low condition on the 2D is pulling down the 3rd, it's complex. But
the policy demonstrates Hubbard's (and Scientology's) attitude to sex
crimes and their admission that they will not use discipline on a sex
criminal. According to Hubbard and Scientology, the girls who were abused
can have 5,000 maximum if they can prove their participation in
Scientology was adversely affected but NO ACTION can be taken on the
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 11 AUGUST 1967
SECOND DYNAMIC RULES
It has never been any part of my plans to regulate or attempt to regulate
the private lives of individuals. Whenever this has occurred it has not
resulted in any improved condition. All I have been interested in, so for
as Scientology law was concerned, was in removing retarding elements or
practices from the path of progress toward freedom. Man is aberrated.
Otherwise we would not be here. He is hard to rescue as he has been
carefully "trained" to do himself harm. I have no concern about the second
dynamic activities of Scientologists save only where they bring suffering
to others and so impede our forward progress. Therefore ALL FORMER RULES,
REGULATIONS AND POLICIES RELATING TO THE SECOND DYNAMIC ACTIVITIES OF
STUDENTS, PRECLEARS, STAFF AND SCIENTOLOGISTS ARE CANCELLED. In their
place, any husband, wife or individual whose processing or training has
been impeded or interrupted beyond any reasonable doubt by second dynamic
activities on the part of staff or associates or their husband or wife may
have recourse to the CHAPLAIN'S COURT, Division 6, of any Scientology
organization, and any case heard, if it be proven beyond reasonable doubt
that, without provocation, a person's training or processing has been
impeded by the irregular second dynamic actions of the defendant, a fine of
not less than 1000 sterling or greater than 5000 sterling shall be
awarded the plaintiff and until paid, the defendant shall have no further
training or processing. This policy is non retroactive (occurrences before
this date may not be tried). No Ethics order shall be issued by reason of
second dynamic activities. All Ethics orders now in force relating to the
second dynamic are cancelled. No staff member may be punished, transferred
or dismissed because of second dynamic activities. No student or preclear
may be suspended or dismissed because of second dynamic activities. Nothing
in this policy letter lays aside our actual knowledge of the consequences
of second dynamic overts against husbands and wives being processed or the
degree to which training or processing can be impeded for someone because
of another's acts. We are also aware that those org staffs which are over
active on the second dynamic seldom prosper.
We also retain any and all technology relating to the second dynamic.
One of Man's primary areas of aberration is the second dynamic.
Processing, not discipline, is the only thing which eradicates aberration
of such depth.
Copyright @ 1967 .
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
L. RON HUBBARD Founder.