Path: sn.no!uninett.no!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail
From: Dkeith@xenu.best.com (Ex Mudder)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: More On Gradys account
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 08:36:34 GMT
Organization: The ARSCC (there is no ARSCC)
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <34481b98.9645434@nntp1.ba.best.com>
References: <344ab4a6.77074184@news.zippo.com>
Reply-To: dkeith@best.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: dkeith.vip.best.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: 877080785 29666 (none) 206.184.139.132
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/16.451
Xref: sn.no alt.religion.scientology:385174

<snip>

>I know that he has already been sued once before for copyright
>infringement and it appears that he is trying to get sued again and
>drag your service provider down with him.

   Dear Mr. Eric Wright.  Please be so kind as to read your case law
on the supreme court case of Falwell v. Flint.  Grady's accusations
regarding the head of the Scientology cult are no more libelous than
Hustler's claim that Jerry Falwell had his first sexual experience
with his mother in an outhouse.  Your canceling of his account based
on a distaste for his speech is censorious and the act of a coward.
The CDA was declared unconstitutional, in case you missed it, and in a
case in San Francisco (Aquino v. "CurioJones" and an ISP) decided that
under the Telecommunications bill, an ISP can not be held liable for
libel or slander by a subscriber (the libel suit against AOL is a
different matter.  As I am unaware that you advertise Grady as an
attraction, it should not apply).
  Your content based censorship is unacceptable.  I hope Mr. Ward uses
his experience with a year of litigation against the cult to sue you.
You may also wish to read up on the suit against Cybercom by another
a.r.s regular who lost his account.

  Posted to alt.religion.scientology and mailed to
eric@wright.northcoast.com

<snip>
>
>On Tue, 14 Oct 1997 23:41:12 +0100, Roland
><roland.rashleigh-berry@_SPAMTRAP_virgin.net> wrote:
>
>>Say Whore. Why havent you managed to close down my website yet?
>>
>>I am talking to you, you shit-vagina whore!
>
>She shudders with involuntary pleasure every time you describe her
>that way. Yes, I know she complains to the judge, but that's just for
>appearances. She is really getting wet down there thinking about her
>children looking up their mom on the Internet and finding "shit-vagina
>whore" accompanying it. Then their grandchildren. Forever. Helena K.
>Kobrin, cult attorney. Shit-vagina 'ho.
>
>Sooner or later her kids will start detesting her for what she is
>doing to their future. What a weakling, what a scientologist. They
>spit on her wrinkled face. They teach their children to defecate on
>her and her publicly-buggered boss, "Rear" Admiral David Miscavige.
>
>Even Eugene Martin Ingram won't fuck her when she is eventually
>offloaded. What a disgusting bitch. Probably be a blessing for her to
>be R2-45'ed.
>
>>You are supposed to protect scientology so why don't you do this
>>instead of doing nothing?
>>
>Because the shit-vagina 'ho is a complete and utter weakling, fool,
>and scientologist. She is suppressive to the top of her
>soon-to-be-inoperative fallopian tubes. Menopause won't come too soon
>for that bitch. What a hairy gelatinous scab in the filthy drain of
>the gene pool.
>
>>You, shit vagina-whore, are a laughing stock.
>>
>Internationally. Forever.
>Keep bending over and spreading 'em, criminal cultists. A LOT more to
>come!


Did Scientology's Standard Tech kill Lisa McPherson?
www.best.com/~dkeith/lisam.htm